{"id":9176,"date":"2016-03-16T13:40:36","date_gmt":"2016-03-16T13:40:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.farmhealthonline.com\/?page_id=9176"},"modified":"2016-07-07T15:46:07","modified_gmt":"2016-07-07T14:46:07","slug":"feeding-pigs","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.farmhealthonline.com\/US\/health-welfare\/pigs\/feeding-pigs\/","title":{"rendered":"Feeding pigs"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n \n \"Print\n <\/a>\n <\/div><\/p>\n

Feeding Pigs<\/h4>\n
<\/div>\n

\"Berkshire\"<\/a>We promote outdoor pig production, integration with crops and the use of home-grown as well as forage-based diets for pigs. There are important challenges when developing feeding systems for these conditions, including balancing the supply and requirements of essential amino acids without relying too much on external feedstuffs and developing and implementing nutritional concepts which help to improve animal health status (Zollitsch et al<\/em>., 2007<\/a>). The energy requirement of pigs kept outdoors is increased as a result of greater exercise and the process of maintaining body temperature. Under Northern European conditions this is typically by about 15% higher than sows kept indoors (Edwards, 2003<\/a>). There are also environmental issues to consider, particularly with regard to diffuse pollution and run-off of nutrients.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

Feeding Pasture and High Fiber Diets<\/h4>\n

\"Pig<\/a>There is potential for grazing to meet some of the nutritional requirements of pigs kept outdoors. However, the extent of the contribution will be very dependent on the effectiveness of pasture management, which will in turn be determined by knowledge of pasture quality. It has been shown that wild boar can meet 45-90% of maintenance energy requirements from grazing pasture, depending on season (Hodgkinson et al<\/em>., 2009<\/a>). The contribution that pasture makes to the animal\u2019s diet will depend on the quality (nutrient composition and digestibility) and the quantity available. The quality will depend on many factors, particularly the grass species composition and age. Although the quantity of pasture consumed will vary with quality and between individuals, Edwards<\/a> (2003) estimates that a sow consuming pasture and fed restricted concentrate feed, typically consumes 4.6 lb grazing herbage dry matter per day and a growing pig fed ad libitum concentrate will consume approx. 0.3\u00a0lb DM\/day.<\/p>\n

Dietary fiber can have both positive and negative influences on gut health (Montagne et al<\/em>., 2003<\/a>). Although pigs have a poor ability to use fibrous leafy or woody materials, they are very effective at using their snouts and well-developed neck muscles to dig for roots, which are a rich source of easily digested starch and sugars (Fuller, 2004<\/a>).<\/p>\n

\"piglets<\/a>

The quality of pasture will depend on species composition, age and season as well as other factors<\/strong><\/p><\/div>\n

Fibrous materials are digested by microbial fermentation in the large intestine. Having a high fiber content reduces the efficiency of energy utilization and may impair utilization of other nutrients (Edwards, 2003<\/a>) and could take us much as half of the energy required for maintenance of sows and a significant proportion of the amino acid, mineral and trace element requirement, although it will be a lot less for growing pigs. The high heat increment of fibrous diets makes them more appropriate under colder conditions (Lee and Close, 1987<\/a>). Etienne<\/a> (1987) recommends the avoiding high levels of fibrous feeds during lactation because of the detrimental effects on sow weight change and on growth and viability of piglets although Oliviero et al<\/a>. (2009) show there are no negative effects of high fiber diets in the three weeks up to farrowing.<\/p>\n

High-fiber diets have been shown to have a beneficial effect on lesion scores, sow behavior and satiety levels (Martin and Edwards, 1994<\/a>), although they do not necessarily reduce grazing and hence pasture damage (Braund et al<\/em>., 1998<\/a>). The motivation to feed is not reduced by fibrous food, although the motivation to drink and manipulate the floor in penned sows is (Lee and Close, 1987<\/a>; Jensen et al<\/em>., 2015<\/a>). Decreased water consumption, and hence urine volume may create handling and disposal problems in slurry-based systems of production, but is unlikely to be the case in genuinely land-based systems.<\/p>\n

The type of fiber provided in the diet can also be important (da Silva, 2012<\/a>), with high lignin and resistant starch diets fibers satisfying feeding behavior more effectively than high pectin fibers.<\/p>\n

\n

Are you an organic farmer?<\/h4>\n

If you are an organic pig farmer, there will be additional considerations regarding how and what you feed to pigs. One of the key issues for organic farmers and those wishing to feed pigs from home-grown feeds is the variation in feed value of both forages and protein crops (Zollitsch, 2007<\/a>). While soybean meal provides a highly digestible and amino acid-rich source of protein, organically grown soya is not always available, and in Europe, where it is not commonly grown and would require importation, there are potential negative social and environmental impacts (West et al<\/em>., 2013<\/a>; Fearnside, 2001<\/a>).<\/p>\n

There are alternative protein crops that easily fit into cropping rotations, but some of these, such as lupins, only partly meet the essential amino acid requirements of growing pigs (N\u00f8rgaard and Fern\u00e1ndez, 2009<\/a>). There is also the risk that in meeting the requirements for some amino acid there is an oversupply of protein in the diet, which in turn can result in excess nitrogen excretion, which has a negative environmental impact (Zollitsch, 2007<\/a>), and can have anti-nutritional impacts on the pig (Salgado et al<\/em>., 2002<\/a>). Beans, and particularly peas, appear to be a potentially good alternative source of protein (Clements et al<\/em>., 2015<\/a>).<\/p>\n

A handbook designed to assist organic pig producers in selecting appropriate diets and feeding strategies has been produced by Edwards<\/a> (2002). This considers the way in which organic systems may differ, and presents simple rules for diet formulation and considers the nutritional value and feeding characteristics of different raw materials for organic pig diets.<\/p>\n

See Feeding organic pigs: A handbook of raw materials and recommendations for feeding practice<\/a><\/p>\n

Further information on organic feeding systems are also covered in the Defra research project Optimising Production Systems for Organic Pig Production (ADAS, 2002<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Feed Intake<\/h4>\n

Pigs at pasture have poorer feed conversion efficiency than indoor pigs i.e. they consume more food to achieve the same liveweight gain. This is particularly true at lower temperatures where food is used to generate body heat so as to maintain normal body temperature. The energy required to do this will depend on how far below the animal\u2019s critical temperature the external temperature is as well as the amount of body fat cover or body condition (various sources cited in Kelly et al<\/em>., 2007<\/a>; Millet et al<\/em>., 2015<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Behavioral Issues<\/h4>\n

Sows fed outdoors do not show high levels of aggression during feeding and low-ranking sows are not as disadvantaged to the same extent as seen indoors, and this is in part a result of having more space for retreat and avoidance (Martin and Edwards, 1994<\/a>).<\/p>\n

\n

Minimizing Nutrient Losses<\/h4>\n

There are environmental risks associated with keeping pigs outdoors, and these are in part concerned with diffuse pollution caused by nutrient loss. Nitrogen losses occur in the form nitrate leaching, ammonia volatilization and denitrification contributing to eutrophication of natural environments, acid rain and global warming. Nutrient losses can also have impacts on subsequent crops if pigs are kept within a cropping rotation. Maintaining grass cover decreases the risk of nitrate leaching but this is difficult to achieve as pigs naturally root and, and in the process, destroy pasture.<\/p>\n

Reducing dietary nitrogen, reducing stocking rate and keeping animals on susceptible pastures for only part of the year have all been identified as providing the most environmentally acceptable way of keeping pigs on pasture.\u00a0 Regular moving of huts, feeding and water troughs can be effective in ensuring that nutrients are more evenly distributed across paddocks (Eriksen et al<\/em>., 2006<\/a>). For more information, visit the Outdoor Access<\/a> page<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Nutrition and Disease<\/h4>\n

Pigs are opportunistic omnivores<\/a><\/span>, and their willingness to consume small animals as well as carrion and excreta from other animals, can create a disease risk, including zoonoses<\/a><\/span> (Fuller, 2004<\/a>). Neurocyctercercosis or brain damage in humans (DeGiorgio et al<\/em>., 2004<\/a>), which may be endemic in many low income countries (Garcia et al<\/em>., 2014<\/a>) which results from the accidental ingestion of eggs of Taenia solium, possibly from the consumption of under-cooked meat from pigs that have consumed human feces infested with Taenia soleum (tapeworm).<\/p>\n

For more on Zoonoses<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Feedipedia<\/h4>\n

is an open access information system on animal feed resources that provides information on nature, occurrence, chemical composition, nutritional value and safe use of nearly 1400 worldwide livestock feeds www.feedipedia.org<\/a>.<\/div>\n

Best Practise Outdoor Feeding Management<\/h4>\n

There are specific requirements to effectively manage feeding in outdoor units.<\/p>\n